Hello Richard,
On 31.03.21 21:36, Richard Weinberger wrote:
James,
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
quoted
Von: "James Bottomley" [off-list ref]
Well, yes. For the TPM, there's a defined ASN.1 format for the keys:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/openssl_tpm2_engine.git/tree/tpm2-asn.h
and part of the design of the file is that it's distinguishable either
in DER or PEM (by the guards) format so any crypto application can know
it's dealing with a TPM key simply by inspecting the file. I think you
need the same thing for CAAM and any other format.
We're encouraging new ASN.1 formats to be of the form
SEQUENCE {
type OBJECT IDENTIFIER
... key specific fields ...
}
Where you choose a defined OID to represent the key and that means
every key even in DER form begins with a unique binary signature.
I like this idea.
Ahmad, what do you think?
That way we could also get rid off the kernel parameter and all the fall back logic,
given that we find a way to reliable detect TEE blobs too...
Sounds good to me. Sumit, your thoughts on doing this for TEE as well?
Thanks,
//richard
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |