Thread (38 messages) 38 messages, 5 authors, 2021-02-23

Re: [PATCH v24 21/25] audit: add support for non-syscall auxiliary records

From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date: 2021-01-27 03:18:06
Also in: lkml, selinux

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 1:58 PM Casey Schaufler [off-list ref] wrote:
On 1/26/2021 10:42 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
quoted
On 2021-01-26 08:41, Casey Schaufler wrote:
quoted
Standalone audit records have the timestamp and serial number generated
on the fly and as such are unique, making them standalone.  This new
function audit_alloc_local() generates a local audit context that will
be used only for a standalone record and its auxiliary record(s).  The
context is discarded immediately after the local associated records are
produced.

Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com
To: Richard Guy Briggs <redacted>
This has been minorly bothering me for several revisions...  Is there a
way for the development/authorship to be accurately reflected
if/when this patch is merged before the contid patch set?
I don't know the right way to do that because I had to pull
some of what was in the original patch out. Any way you would
like it done is fine with me.
I'm not sure if there is one perfect way.  I typically see either a
"From: " line if the author is different from the submitter, or in
more complex cases such as this it seems like a simple note giving
credit in the description might be the best option.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help