Re: [PATCH v22 08/12] landlock: Add syscall implementations
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Date: 2020-10-29 11:30:18
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arch, linux-doc, linux-fsdevel, linux-kselftest, lkml
On 29/10/2020 02:06, Jann Horn wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 9:04 PM Mickaël Salaün [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
These 3 system calls are designed to be used by unprivileged processes to sandbox themselves: * landlock_create_ruleset(2): Creates a ruleset and returns its file descriptor. * landlock_add_rule(2): Adds a rule (e.g. file hierarchy access) to a ruleset, identified by the dedicated file descriptor. * landlock_enforce_ruleset_current(2): Enforces a ruleset on the current thread and its future children (similar to seccomp). This syscall has the same usage restrictions as seccomp(2): the caller must have the no_new_privs attribute set or have CAP_SYS_ADMIN in the current user namespace.[...]quoted
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <redacted> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <redacted>[...]quoted
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h b/include/uapi/linux/landlock.h[...]quoted
+/** + * struct landlock_path_beneath_attr - Path hierarchy definition + * + * Argument of sys_landlock_add_rule(). + */ +struct landlock_path_beneath_attr { + /** + * @allowed_access: Bitmask of allowed actions for this file hierarchy + * (cf. `Filesystem flags`_). + */ + __u64 allowed_access; + /** + * @parent_fd: File descriptor, open with ``O_PATH``, which identifynit: "identifies"
OK
quoted
+ * the parent directory of a file hierarchy, or just a file. + */ + __s32 parent_fd; + /* + * This struct is packed to avoid trailing reserved members. + * Cf. security/landlock/syscall.c:build_check_abi() + */ +} __attribute__((packed));[...]quoted
diff --git a/security/landlock/syscall.c b/security/landlock/syscall.c[...]quoted
+static int copy_min_struct_from_user(void *const dst, const size_t ksize, + const size_t ksize_min, const void __user *const src, + const size_t usize) +{ + /* Checks buffer inconsistencies. */ + BUILD_BUG_ON(!dst); + if (!src) + return -EFAULT; + + /* Checks size ranges. */ + BUILD_BUG_ON(ksize <= 0); + BUILD_BUG_ON(ksize < ksize_min);To make these checks work reliably, you should add __always_inline to the function.
Done.
quoted
+ if (usize < ksize_min) + return -EINVAL; + if (usize > PAGE_SIZE) + return -E2BIG; + + /* Copies user buffer and fills with zeros. */ + return copy_struct_from_user(dst, ksize, src, usize); +}[...]quoted
+static int get_path_from_fd(const s32 fd, struct path *const path) +{ + struct fd f; + int err = 0; + + BUILD_BUG_ON(!__same_type(fd, + ((struct landlock_path_beneath_attr *)NULL)->parent_fd)); + + /* Handles O_PATH. */ + f = fdget_raw(fd); + if (!f.file) + return -EBADF; + /* + * Only allows O_PATH file descriptor: enables to restrict ambient + * filesystem access without requiring to open and risk leaking or + * misusing a file descriptor. Forbid internal filesystems (e.g. + * nsfs), including pseudo filesystems that will never be mountable + * (e.g. sockfs, pipefs). + */ + if (!(f.file->f_mode & FMODE_PATH) || + (f.file->f_path.mnt->mnt_flags & MNT_INTERNAL) || + (f.file->f_path.dentry->d_sb->s_flags & SB_NOUSER) || + d_is_negative(f.file->f_path.dentry) || + IS_PRIVATE(d_backing_inode(f.file->f_path.dentry))) { + err = -EBADFD; + goto out_fdput; + } + path->mnt = f.file->f_path.mnt; + path->dentry = f.file->f_path.dentry;those two lines can be replaced with "*path = f.file->f_path"
Done.
quoted
+ path_get(path); + +out_fdput: + fdput(f); + return err; +}[...]quoted
+/** + * sys_landlock_enforce_ruleset_current - Enforce a ruleset on the current task + * + * @ruleset_fd: File descriptor tied to the ruleset to merge with the target. + * @flags: Must be 0. + * + * This system call enables to enforce a Landlock ruleset on the current + * thread. Enforcing a ruleset requires that the task has CAP_SYS_ADMIN in its + * namespace or be running with no_new_privs. This avoids scenarios wheres/be/is/
OK.
quoted
+ * unprivileged tasks can affect the behavior of privileged children. + * + * Possible returned errors are: + * + * - EOPNOTSUPP: Landlock is supported by the kernel but disabled at boot time; + * - EINVAL: @flags is not 0. + * - EBADF: @ruleset_fd is not a file descriptor for the current thread; + * - EBADFD: @ruleset_fd is not a ruleset file descriptor; + * - EPERM: @ruleset_fd has no read access to the underlying ruleset, or the + * current thread is not running with no_new_privs (or doesn't have + * CAP_SYS_ADMIN in its namespace). + */ +SYSCALL_DEFINE2(landlock_enforce_ruleset_current, + const int, ruleset_fd, const __u32, flags) +{ + struct landlock_ruleset *new_dom, *ruleset; + struct cred *new_cred; + struct landlock_cred_security *new_llcred; + int err; + + if (!landlock_initialized) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + /* No flag for now. */ + if (flags) + return -EINVAL; + + /* + * Similar checks as for seccomp(2), except that an -EPERM may be + * returned. + */ + if (!task_no_new_privs(current)) { + err = security_capable(current_cred(), current_user_ns(), + CAP_SYS_ADMIN, CAP_OPT_NOAUDIT);I think this should be ns_capable_noaudit(current_user_ns(), CAP_SYS_ADMIN)?
Right. The main difference is that ns_capable*() set PF_SUPERPRIV in current->flags. I guess seccomp should use ns_capable_noaudit() as well?
quoted
+ if (err) + return err; + } + + /* Gets and checks the ruleset. */ + ruleset = get_ruleset_from_fd(ruleset_fd, FMODE_CAN_READ); + if (IS_ERR(ruleset)) + return PTR_ERR(ruleset); + + /* Prepares new credentials. */ + new_cred = prepare_creds(); + if (!new_cred) { + err = -ENOMEM; + goto out_put_ruleset; + } + new_llcred = landlock_cred(new_cred); + + /* + * There is no possible race condition while copying and manipulating + * the current credentials because they are dedicated per thread. + */ + new_dom = landlock_merge_ruleset(new_llcred->domain, ruleset); + if (IS_ERR(new_dom)) { + err = PTR_ERR(new_dom); + goto out_put_creds; + } + + /* Replaces the old (prepared) domain. */ + landlock_put_ruleset(new_llcred->domain); + new_llcred->domain = new_dom; + + landlock_put_ruleset(ruleset); + return commit_creds(new_cred); + +out_put_creds: + abort_creds(new_cred); + return err;I think this "return err" is wrong - don't we still have to put "ruleset" here?
Oh yes, good catch!
quoted
+out_put_ruleset: + landlock_put_ruleset(ruleset); + return err; +} -- 2.28.0