Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 6 authors, 2020-09-30

Re: Commit 13c164b1a186 - regression for LSMs/SELinux?

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2020-09-21 16:09:22
Also in: autofs, selinux

[adding Linus and Al]

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:51:35PM +0200, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
Hi folks,

It seems that after commit 13c164b1a186 ("autofs: switch to
kernel_write") there is now an extra LSM permission required (for the
current task to write to the automount pipe) for processes accessing
some yet-to-to-be mounted directory on which an autofs mount is set
up. The call chain is:
[...]
autofs_wait() ->
autofs_notify_daemon() ->
autofs_write() ->
kernel_write() ->
rw_verify_area() ->
security_file_permission()

The bug report that led me to this commit is at [1].

Technically, this is a regression for LSM users, since this is a
kernel-internal operation and an LSM permission for the current task
shouldn't be required. Can this patch be reverted? Perhaps
__kernel_{read|write}() could instead be renamed to kernel_*_nocheck()
so that the name is more descriptive?
So we obviously should not break existing user space and need to fix
this ASAP.  The trivial "fix" would be to export __kernel_write again
and switch autofs to use it.  The other option would be a FMODE flag
to bypass security checks, only to be set if the callers ensures
they've been valided (i.e. in autofs_prepare_pipe).

Any opinions?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help