Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2020-07-23

Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: remove redundant memset

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: 2020-07-22 20:20:07
Also in: keyrings, lkml

On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 13:10 -0700, Tom Rix wrote:
On 7/22/20 1:02 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2020-07-22 at 06:46 -0700, trix@redhat.com wrote:
quoted
From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>

Reviewing use of memset in keyctrl_pkey.c

keyctl_pkey_params_get prologue code to set params up

	memset(params, 0, sizeof(*params));
	params->encoding = "raw";

keyctl_pkey_query has the same prologue
and calls keyctl_pkey_params_get.

So remove the prologue.

Fixes: 00d60fd3b932 ("KEYS: Provide keyctls to drive the new key type ops for asymmetric keys [ver #2]")
At best, this is a micro optimization.
Yes
quoted
How is this appropriate for a Fixes: line?
Removing unneeded code is not a fix?
IMO: there's no "bug" here.

It's not a logic defect causing some unintended outcome.
It doesn't need backporting to stable branches.

Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst-If your patch fixes a bug in a specific commit, e.g. you found an issue using
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:``git bisect``, please use the 'Fixes:' tag with the first 12 characters of
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst-the SHA-1 ID, and the one line summary.


Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help