Thread (26 messages) flat view 26 messages, 4 authors, 2020-07-20

Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] ima: Fail rule parsing when the KEY_CHECK hook is combined with an invalid cond

From: Nayna <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-17 18:57:05
Also in: linux-integrity, lkml

On 7/9/20 2:19 AM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The KEY_CHECK function only supports the uid, pcr, and keyrings
conditionals. Make this clear at policy load so that IMA policy authors
don't assume that other conditionals are supported.

Fixes: 5808611cccb2 ("IMA: Add KEY_CHECK func to measure keys")
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <redacted>
---

* v3
   - Added Lakshmi's Reviewed-by
   - Adjust for the indentation change introduced in patch #4
* v2
   - No change

  security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 7 +++++++
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 1c64bd6f1728..81da02071d41 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -1023,6 +1023,13 @@ static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
  		if (entry->action & ~(MEASURE | DONT_MEASURE))
  			return false;

+		if (entry->flags & ~(IMA_FUNC | IMA_UID | IMA_PCR |
+				     IMA_KEYRINGS))
+			return false;
+
+		if (ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond(entry))
+			return false;
+
  		break;
  	default:
  		return false;
Should there be a check for IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS in Opt_keyrings 
in ima_parse_rule() to return immediately if not enabled ?

Thanks & Regards,

      - Nayna

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help