[PATCH v3 04/12] ima: Fail rule parsing when buffer hook functions have an invalid action
From: Tyler Hicks <hidden>
Date: 2020-07-09 06:20:11
Also in:
linux-integrity, lkml
Subsystem:
extended verification module (evm), integrity measurement architecture (ima), security subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
Mimi Zohar, Roberto Sassu, Dmitry Kasatkin, Paul Moore, James Morris, "Serge E. Hallyn", Linus Torvalds
Buffer based hook functions, such as KEXEC_CMDLINE and KEY_CHECK, can
only measure. The process_buffer_measurement() function quietly ignores
all actions except measure so make this behavior clear at the time of
policy load.
The parsing of the keyrings conditional had a check to ensure that it
was only specified with measure actions but the check should be on the
hook function and not the keyrings conditional since
"appraise func=KEY_CHECK" is not a valid rule.
Fixes: b0935123a183 ("IMA: Define a new hook to measure the kexec boot command line arguments")
Fixes: 5808611cccb2 ("IMA: Add KEY_CHECK func to measure keys")
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <redacted>
---
* v3
- Add comments to ima_validate_rule() to separate/explain the types of
validation checks (section for action checks, section for hook
function checks, soon to be a section for combination of options
checks, etc.)
- Removed the "if (entry->flags & IMA_FUNC)" conditional around the
switch statement in ima_validate_rule() which reduced the overall indention
by a tab. This could be removed because entry->func is NONE when the
IMA_FUNC flag is not set. We'll explicitly enforce and then leverage
that property in a later patch when we start validating all hook
functions in ima_validate_rule().
- Add comment explicitly stating that all hook functions except
KEXEC_CMDLINE and KEY_CHECK are still being validated in
ima_parse_rule().
* v2
- No change
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index e458cd47c099..40c28f1a6a5a 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c@@ -973,6 +973,43 @@ static void check_template_modsig(const struct ima_template_desc *template) #undef MSG } +static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry) +{ + /* Ensure that the action is set */ + if (entry->action == UNKNOWN) + return false; + + /* + * Ensure that the hook function is compatible with the other + * components of the rule + */ + switch (entry->func) { + case NONE: + case FILE_CHECK: + case MMAP_CHECK: + case BPRM_CHECK: + case CREDS_CHECK: + case POST_SETATTR: + case MODULE_CHECK: + case FIRMWARE_CHECK: + case KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK: + case KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK: + case POLICY_CHECK: + /* Validation of these hook functions is in ima_parse_rule() */ + break; + case KEXEC_CMDLINE: + case KEY_CHECK: + if (entry->action & ~(MEASURE | DONT_MEASURE)) + return false; + + break; + default: + return false; + } + + return true; +} + static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) { struct audit_buffer *ab;
@@ -1150,7 +1187,6 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) keyrings_len = strlen(args[0].from) + 1; if ((entry->keyrings) || - (entry->action != MEASURE) || (entry->func != KEY_CHECK) || (keyrings_len < 2)) { result = -EINVAL;
@@ -1356,7 +1392,7 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) break; } } - if (!result && (entry->action == UNKNOWN)) + if (!result && !ima_validate_rule(entry)) result = -EINVAL; else if (entry->action == APPRAISE) temp_ima_appraise |= ima_appraise_flag(entry->func);
--
2.25.1