Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 2 authors, 2020-02-11

Re: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: rename sm3-256 to sm3 in hash_algo_name

From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2020-02-11 23:24:10
Also in: linux-crypto, linux-integrity, lkml

On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 16:49 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 20:44 +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
quoted
The name sm3-256 is defined in hash_algo_name in hash_info, but the
algorithm name implemented in sm3_generic.c is sm3, which will cause
the sm3-256 algorithm to be not found in some application scenarios of
the hash algorithm, and an ENOENT error will occur. For example,
IMA, keys, and other subsystems that reference hash_algo_name all use
the hash algorithm of sm3.

Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <redacted>
The "hash_map" needs to be updated to reflect this change.

static struct tpm2_hash tpm2_hash_map[] = {
        {HASH_ALGO_SHA1, TPM_ALG_SHA1},
        {HASH_ALGO_SHA256, TPM_ALG_SHA256},
        {HASH_ALGO_SHA384, TPM_ALG_SHA384},
        {HASH_ALGO_SHA512, TPM_ALG_SHA512},
        {HASH_ALGO_SM3_256, TPM_ALG_SM3_256},
};
Never mind, the enum name "HASH_ALGO_SM3_256" didn't change.  Just the
string changed.

Mimi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help