Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 3 authors, 2019-03-07

Re: [PATCH v2] x86/ima: require signed kernel modules

From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2019-03-07 22:34:57
Also in: linux-integrity, lkml

On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 14:27 -0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:18 AM Mimi Zohar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
-       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot())
+       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot()) {
+               if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG))
+                       set_module_sig_enforced();
                return sb_arch_rules;
Linus previously pushed back on having the lockdown features
automatically enabled on secure boot systems. Why are we doing the
same in IMA?
IMA-appraisal is extending the "secure boot" concept to the running
system.

Mimi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help