Re: [PATCH v2] x86/ima: require signed kernel modules
From: Matthew Garrett <hidden>
Date: 2019-03-07 22:27:46
Also in:
linux-integrity, lkml
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 4:18 AM Mimi Zohar [off-list ref] wrote:
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot())
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IMA_ARCH_POLICY) && arch_ima_get_secureboot()) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG))
+ set_module_sig_enforced();
return sb_arch_rules;Linus previously pushed back on having the lockdown features automatically enabled on secure boot systems. Why are we doing the same in IMA?