Re: [PATCH v2] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a missing break | linux-security-module | Ratatoskr

[PATCH v2] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a missing break · Gustavo A. R. Silva <hidden> · 2019-02-08
Re: [PATCH v2] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a missing break · Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> · 2019-02-08
Re: [PATCH v2] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a missing break · Gustavo A. R. Silva <hidden> · 2019-02-19
Re: [PATCH v2] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a missing break · Gustavo A. R. Silva <hidden> · 2019-02-22
Re: [PATCH v2] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a missing break · James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> · 2019-02-22
Re: [PATCH v2] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a missing break · Gustavo A. R. Silva <hidden> · 2019-02-22
Re: [PATCH v2] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a missing break · James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> · 2019-02-22

Re: [PATCH v2] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a missing break

From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <hidden>
Date: 2019-02-22 22:42:16
Also in: linux-integrity, lkml


On 2/22/19 11:53 AM, James Morris wrote:

On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:

quoted

Hi James,

I wonder if you can take this, please.

Ok -- I had thought you were sending all of these upstream across the 
board.

Yeah, I'm only doing that in cases where patches are being ignored.

Thanks
--
Gustavo