Re: [PATCH v2] security: mark expected switch fall-throughs and add a missing break
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Date: 2019-02-22 17:53:31
Also in:
linux-integrity, lkml
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi James, I wonder if you can take this, please.
Ok -- I had thought you were sending all of these upstream across the board.
Thanks -- Gustavo On 2/18/19 8:53 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:quoted
On 2/8/19 3:13 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:quoted
On Fri, 2019-02-08 at 14:54 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:quoted
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. This patch fixes the following warnings: security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c:85:10: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:940:18: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:943:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:972:21: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:974:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] security/smack/smack_lsm.c:3391:9: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] security/apparmor/domain.c:569:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 Also, add a missing break statement to fix the following warning: security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:116:26: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <redacted>Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>Thanks, Mimi. -- Gustavoquoted
quoted
--- Changes in v2: - Update Subject. - Integrate a missing break in switch fix by Mimi Zohar. security/apparmor/domain.c | 2 +- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 1 + security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 4 ++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c | 1 + security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 3 +-- 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/security/apparmor/domain.c b/security/apparmor/domain.c index 3b266a438776..ca2dccf5b445 100644 --- a/security/apparmor/domain.c +++ b/security/apparmor/domain.c@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static struct aa_label *x_to_label(struct aa_profile *profile, stack = NULL; break; } - /* fall through to X_NAME */ + /* fall through - to X_NAME */ case AA_X_NAME: if (xindex & AA_X_CHILD) /* released by caller */diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index a2baa85ea2f5..5fb7127bbe68 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ static void ima_set_cache_status(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, break; case CREDS_CHECK: iint->ima_creds_status = status; + break; case FILE_CHECK: case POST_SETATTR: iint->ima_file_status = status;diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index 26fa9d9723f6..e0cc323f948f 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c@@ -936,10 +936,12 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) case Opt_uid_gt: case Opt_euid_gt: entry->uid_op = &uid_gt; + /* fall through */ case Opt_uid_lt: case Opt_euid_lt: if ((token == Opt_uid_lt) || (token == Opt_euid_lt)) entry->uid_op = &uid_lt; + /* fall through */ case Opt_uid_eq: case Opt_euid_eq: uid_token = (token == Opt_uid_eq) ||@@ -968,9 +970,11 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry) break; case Opt_fowner_gt: entry->fowner_op = &uid_gt; + /* fall through */ case Opt_fowner_lt: if (token == Opt_fowner_lt) entry->fowner_op = &uid_lt; + /* fall through */ case Opt_fowner_eq: ima_log_string_op(ab, "fowner", args[0].from, entry->fowner_op);diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c index 43752002c222..513b457ae900 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ static void ima_show_template_data_ascii(struct seq_file *m, /* skip ':' and '\0' */ buf_ptr += 2; buflen -= buf_ptr - field_data->data; + /* fall through */ case DATA_FMT_DIGEST: case DATA_FMT_HEX: if (!buflen)diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c index 587dc06eba33..5c1613519d5a 100644 --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c@@ -3380,13 +3380,12 @@ static void smack_d_instantiate(struct dentry *opt_dentry, struct inode *inode) */ final = &smack_known_star; /* - * Fall through. - * * If a smack value has been set we want to use it, * but since tmpfs isn't giving us the opportunity * to set mount options simulate setting the * superblock default. */ + /* Fall through */ default: /* * This isn't an understood special case.
-- James Morris [off-list ref]