Re: Getting weird TPM error after rebasing my tree to security/next-general
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <hidden>
Date: 2019-01-31 12:26:13
Also in:
linux-integrity, lkml
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 03:20:16PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 07:43:30AM +1300, Linus Torvalds wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 4:36 AM Jarkko Sakkinen [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
Is it just that this particular hardware always happened to trigger the ERMS case (ie "rep movsb")?This is the particular snippet in question: memcpy_fromio(buf, priv->rsp, 6); expected = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *) &buf[2]); if (expected > count || expected < 6) return -EIO;Ok, strange. So what *used* to happen is that the memcpy_fromio() would just expand as a "memcpy()", and in this case, gcc would then inline the memcpy(). In fact, gcc does it as a 4-byte access and a two-byte access from what I can tell.I verified, and it is exactly as you stated: 0xffffffff814aaa33 <+51>: mov (%rax),%edx 0xffffffff814aaa35 <+53>: mov %edx,0x0(%rbp) 0xffffffff814aaa38 <+56>: movzwl 0x4(%rax),%eax 0xffffffff814aaa3c <+60>: mov %ax,0x4(%rbp) And your new version does exactly the same thing to the first six bytes (with different opcode, but the same memory access pattern).
I think I have found the root cause: memcpy_fromio(&__rsp_pa, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_rsp_pa, 8); This is from crb_map_io(). This should be read as quad word. I'll change it to ioread64() and see what happens. I don't know why it even has used memcpy_fromio() in the first place. I guess, when I first implemented the driver, I used that for no logical reason, and it has worked since up until now. /Jarkko