Thread (91 messages) 91 messages, 11 authors, 2018-12-13

Re: [RFC v2 12/13] keys/mktme: Save MKTME data if kernel cmdline parameter allows

From: Kirill A. Shutemov <hidden>
Date: 2018-12-07 11:47:17
Also in: keyrings, linux-mm

On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 02:14:03AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
Alternatively, we can choose to use per-socket keyID, but not to program
keyID globally across all sockets, so you don't have to save key while
still supporting CPU hotplug.
Per-socket KeyID approach would make things more complex. For instance
KeyID on its own will not be enough to refer a key. You will need a node
too. It will also require a way to track whether theirs an KeyID on other
node for the key.

It also makes memory management less flexible: runtime migration of the
memory between nodes will be limited and it can hurt memory availablity
for non-encrypted tasks too.

In general, I don't see per-socket KeyID handling very attractive. It
creates more problems than solves.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help