Re: [PATCH 06/17] prmem: test cases for memory protection
From: Randy Dunlap <hidden>
Date: 2018-10-24 03:27:20
Also in:
linux-integrity, linux-mm, lkml
On 10/23/18 2:34 PM, Igor Stoppa wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/mm/Kconfig.debug b/mm/Kconfig.debug index 9a7b8b049d04..57de5b3c0bae 100644 --- a/mm/Kconfig.debug +++ b/mm/Kconfig.debug@@ -94,3 +94,12 @@ config DEBUG_RODATA_TEST depends on STRICT_KERNEL_RWX ---help--- This option enables a testcase for the setting rodata read-only. + +config DEBUG_PRMEM_TEST + tristate "Run self test for protected memory" + depends on STRICT_KERNEL_RWX + select PRMEM + default n + help + Tries to verify that the memory protection works correctly and that + the memory is effectively protected.
Hi, a. It seems backwards (or upside down) to have a test case select a feature (PRMEM) instead of depending on that feature. b. Since PRMEM depends on MMU (in patch 04/17), the "select" here could try to enabled PRMEM even when MMU is not enabled. Changing this to "depends on PRMEM" would solve both of these issues. c. Don't use "default n". That is already the default. thanks, -- ~Randy