On 9/20/2018 5:45 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Casey Schaufler [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 9/20/2018 9:23 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
config LSM_ORDER
string "Default initialization order of builtin LSMs"
- default "yama,loadpin,integrity"
+ default "yama,loadpin,integrity,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor"
If I want to compile all the major modules into my kernel and use
AppArmor by default would I use
default "yama,loadpin,integrity,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo"
or
default "yama,loadpin,integrity,apparmor"
I was expecting the former, but the latter will have the same result.
quoted
When we have "blob-sharing" how could I compile in tomoyo,
but exclude it without a boot line option?
Ooh, yes, this series has no way to do that. Perhaps
CONFIG_LSM_DISABLE in the same form as CONFIG_LSM_ORDER? I would
totally remove LoadPin's CONFIG for this in favor it.
I would generally prefer an optional CONFIG_LSM_ENABLE to
CONFIG_LSM_DISABLE, but I understand the logic behind your
approach. I would be looking for something like
CONFIG LSM_ENABLE
string "Default set of enabled LSMs"
default ""
as opposed to
CONFIG LSM_DISABLE
string "Default set of disabled LSMs"
default ""
where an empty string is interpreted as "use 'em all"
in either case.
quoted
When we have full stacking, how could I compile in selinux
but exclude it?
Yup, same problem. Same suggested solution?
Should lsm.enable/disable= also become a comma-separated list, or
should I leave it as a multi-instance thing like I have it?
I prefer the multi-instance
lsm.disable=selinux lsm.disable=yama
to the list
lsm.disable=selinux,yama
but at this point I don't really care all that much.