Thread (45 messages) 45 messages, 4 authors, 2018-09-21

[PATCH security-next v2 26/26] LSM: Add all exclusive LSMs to ordered initialization

From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2018-09-21 00:45:56
Also in: linux-arch, linux-doc, lkml

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 5:25 PM, Casey Schaufler [off-list ref] wrote:
On 9/20/2018 9:23 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
quoted
 config LSM_ORDER
      string "Default initialization order of builtin LSMs"
-     default "yama,loadpin,integrity"
+     default "yama,loadpin,integrity,selinux,smack,tomoyo,apparmor"
If I want to compile all the major modules into my kernel and use
AppArmor by default would I use

        default "yama,loadpin,integrity,apparmor,selinux,smack,tomoyo"

or

        default "yama,loadpin,integrity,apparmor"
I was expecting the former, but the latter will have the same result.
When we have "blob-sharing" how could I compile in tomoyo,
but exclude it without a boot line option?
Ooh, yes, this series has no way to do that. Perhaps
CONFIG_LSM_DISABLE in the same form as CONFIG_LSM_ORDER? I would
totally remove LoadPin's CONFIG for this in favor it.
When we have full stacking, how could I compile in selinux
but exclude it?
Yup, same problem. Same suggested solution?

Should lsm.enable/disable= also become a comma-separated list, or
should I leave it as a multi-instance thing like I have it?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help