[PATCH 01/13] selinux: Cleanup printk logging in conditional
From: peter enderborg <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-13 06:23:10
Also in:
lkml, selinux
On 06/12/2018 04:38 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 10:09 +0200, Peter Enderborg wrote:quoted
Replace printk with pr_* to avoid checkpatch warnings.I believe it would be nicer to remove the "SELinux: " prefix embbeded in each format and use a specific #define pr_fmt(fmt) "SELinux: " fmt to automatically prefix these formats.
I cant argument about that, however some of the warnings and debug prints in this set does not have this so it will then change the actual output. (And I also think that they should have a the prefix, but I don't know why they don't) So I am not sure if it appropriate for a cleanup patch, it supposed to have no functional change.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
quoted
diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c[]quoted
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ int evaluate_cond_node(struct policydb *p, struct cond_node *node) if (new_state != node->cur_state) { node->cur_state = new_state; if (new_state == -1) - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: expression result was undefined - disabling all rules.\n"); + pr_err("SELinux: expression result was undefined - disabling all rules.\n"); /* turn the rules on or off */ for (cur = node->true_list; cur; cur = cur->next) { if (new_state <= 0)So, for instance, this patch could become: (etc and so forth for each patch in this series) --- security/selinux/ss/conditional.c | 18 ++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c index c91543a617ac..e96820d92b61 100644 --- a/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c +++ b/security/selinux/ss/conditional.c@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ * the Free Software Foundation, version 2. */ +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "SELinux: " fmt + #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/errno.h> #include <linux/string.h>@@ -96,7 +98,7 @@ int evaluate_cond_node(struct policydb *p, struct cond_node *node) if (new_state != node->cur_state) { node->cur_state = new_state; if (new_state == -1) - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: expression result was undefined - disabling all rules.\n"); + pr_err("expression result was undefined - disabling all rules\n"); /* turn the rules on or off */ for (cur = node->true_list; cur; cur = cur->next) { if (new_state <= 0)@@ -287,7 +289,7 @@ static int cond_insertf(struct avtab *a, struct avtab_key *k, struct avtab_datum */ if (k->specified & AVTAB_TYPE) { if (avtab_search(&p->te_avtab, k)) { - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: type rule already exists outside of a conditional.\n"); + pr_err("type rule already exists outside of a conditional\n"); goto err; } /*@@ -302,7 +304,7 @@ static int cond_insertf(struct avtab *a, struct avtab_key *k, struct avtab_datum node_ptr = avtab_search_node(&p->te_cond_avtab, k); if (node_ptr) { if (avtab_search_node_next(node_ptr, k->specified)) { - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: too many conflicting type rules.\n"); + pr_err("too many conflicting type rules\n"); goto err; } found = 0;@@ -313,13 +315,13 @@ static int cond_insertf(struct avtab *a, struct avtab_key *k, struct avtab_datum } } if (!found) { - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: conflicting type rules.\n"); + pr_err("conflicting type rules\n"); goto err; } } } else { if (avtab_search(&p->te_cond_avtab, k)) { - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: conflicting type rules when adding type rule for true.\n"); + pr_err("conflicting type rules when adding type rule for true\n"); goto err; } }@@ -327,7 +329,7 @@ static int cond_insertf(struct avtab *a, struct avtab_key *k, struct avtab_datum node_ptr = avtab_insert_nonunique(&p->te_cond_avtab, k, d); if (!node_ptr) { - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: could not insert rule.\n"); + pr_err("could not insert rule\n"); rc = -ENOMEM; goto err; }@@ -387,12 +389,12 @@ static int cond_read_av_list(struct policydb *p, void *fp, struct cond_av_list * static int expr_isvalid(struct policydb *p, struct cond_expr *expr) { if (expr->expr_type <= 0 || expr->expr_type > COND_LAST) { - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: conditional expressions uses unknown operator.\n"); + pr_err("conditional expressions uses unknown operator\n"); return 0; } if (expr->bool > p->p_bools.nprim) { - printk(KERN_ERR "SELinux: conditional expressions uses unknown bool.\n"); + pr_err("conditional expressions uses unknown bool\n"); return 0; } return 1;
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html