Thread (29 messages) 29 messages, 6 authors, 2017-11-28

[PATCH v4 2/4] tpm: ignore burstcount to improve tpm_tis send() performance

From: Mimi Zohar <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-26 16:37:52
Also in: linux-integrity, lkml

[Cc'ing Dave and Leendeert]

Hi Jarkko,
quoted
It seems that the last byte was sent from the beginning (27084ef
[PATCH] tpm: driver for next generation TPM chips,), does anyone
remember the reason ?
Sent from the beginning?
I went through the commit logs to see if any of the patch descriptions
have an explanation for sending the last byte separately. Based on
commit 27084efee0c3 "[PATCH] tpm: driver for next generation TPM
chips", it seems it's been there since the beginning.

Dave, Leendert, Do either of you remember the reason for
tpm_tis_send_data() sending the last byte separately?

thanks,

Mimi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help