Thread (29 messages) 29 messages, 6 authors, 2017-11-28

[PATCH v4 2/4] tpm: ignore burstcount to improve tpm_tis send() performance

From: Jarkko Sakkinen <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-26 15:22:24
Also in: linux-integrity, lkml

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 08:17:42PM +0530, Nayna Jain wrote:
Yeah, you are right, the first version of this patch sent all the
bytes together, but after hearing ddwg inputs, i.e. "The last byte was
introduced for error checking purposes (history).", I reverted back to
original to be safe.
What does that mean ie error checking purposes?
It seems that the last byte was sent from the beginning (27084ef
[PATCH] tpm: driver for next generation TPM chips,), does anyone
remember the reason ?
Sent from the beginning?

/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help