On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Kees Cook [off-list ref] wrote:
Instead of a separate function, open-code the cap_elevated test, which
lets us entirely remove bprm->cap_effective (to use the local "effective"
variable instead), and more accurately examine euid/egid changes via the
existing local "is_setid".
...
-static int is_secureexec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
-{
- const struct cred *cred = bprm->cred;
- kuid_t root_uid = make_kuid(cred->user_ns, 0);
-
- if (!uid_eq(cred->uid, root_uid)) {
- if (bprm->cap_effective)
- return 1;
- if (!cap_issubset(cred->cap_permitted, cred->cap_ambient))
- return 1;
+ bprm->cap_elevated = 0;
+ if (is_setid) {
+ bprm->cap_elevated = 1;
+ } else if (!uid_eq(new->uid, root_uid)) {
+ if (effective ||
+ !cap_issubset(new->cap_permitted, new->cap_ambient))
+ bprm->cap_elevated = 1;
}
- return (!uid_eq(cred->euid, cred->uid) ||
- !gid_eq(cred->egid, cred->gid));
+ return 0;
I think this matches the old behavior. IOW it looks right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html