[PATCH 0/3] Enable namespaced file capabilities
From: Stefan Berger <hidden>
Date: 2017-06-23 17:39:31
Also in:
lkml, oe-lkp
On 06/23/2017 01:07 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 11:30 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:quoted
Quoting Casey Schaufler (casey at schaufler-ca.com):quoted
Or maybe just security.ns.capability, taking James' comment into account.That last one may be suitable as an option, useful for his particular (somewhat barbaric :) use case, but it's not ok for the general solution. If uid 1000 was delegated the subuids 100000-199999, it should be able to write a file capability for use by his subuids, but that file capability must not apply to other subuids.I don't think it's barbaric, I think it's the common use case. Let me give a more comprehensible answer in terms of docker and IMA. Lets suppose I'm running docker locally and in a test cloud both with userns enabled. I build an image locally, mapping my uid (1000) to root. If I begin with a standard base, each of the files has a security.ima signature. Now I add my layer, which involves updating a file, so I need to write a new signature to security.ima. Because I'm running user namespaced, the update gets written at security.ima at uid=1000 when I do a docker save. Now supposing I deploy that image to a cloud. As a tenant, the cloud gives me real uid 4531 and maps that to root. Execution of the binary fails because it tries to use the underlying signature (in security.ima) as there is no xattr named security.ima at uid=4531
Yes. An answer would be to have Docker rewrite these on the fly. It
knows what uid the container was running as and specifically looks for
security.ima at uid=1000 or security.ima, takes the former if it finds,
otherwise the latter or nothing.
Stefan
So my essential point is that building the real kuid into the permanent record of the xattr damages image portability, which is touted as one of the real advantages of container images. James
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html