Thread (43 messages) 43 messages, 8 authors, 2017-06-28

[PATCH 0/3] Enable namespaced file capabilities

From: serge@hallyn.com (Serge E. Hallyn)
Date: 2017-06-23 16:00:28
Also in: lkml

Quoting Amir Goldstein (amir73il at gmail.com):
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Stefan Berger
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This series of patches primary goal is to enable file capabilities
in user namespaces without affecting the file capabilities that are
effective on the host. This is to prevent that any unprivileged user
on the host maps his own uid to root in a private namespace, writes
the xattr, and executes the file with privilege on the host.

We achieve this goal by writing extended attributes with a different
name when a user namespace is used. If for example the root user
in a user namespace writes the security.capability xattr, the name
of the xattr that is actually written is encoded as
security.capability at uid=1000 for root mapped to uid 1000 on the host.
When listing the xattrs on the host, the existing security.capability
as well as the security.capability at uid=1000 will be shown. Inside the
namespace only 'security.capability', with the value of
security.capability at uid=1000, is visible.
Am I the only one who thinks that suffix is perhaps not the best grammar
to use for this namespace?
You're the only one to have mentioned it so far.
xattrs are clearly namespaced by prefix, so it seems right to me to keep
it that way - define a new special xattr namespace "ns" and only if that
prefix exists, the @uid suffix will be parsed.
This could be either  ns.security.capability at uid=1000 or
ns at uid=1000.security.capability. The latter seems more correct to me,
because then we will be able to namespace any xattr without having to
protect from "unprivileged xattr injection", i.e.:
setfattr -n "user.whatever.foo at uid=0"
I like it for simplifying the parser code.  One concern I have is that,
since ns.* is currently not gated, one could write ns.* on an older
kernel and then exploit it on a newer one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help