Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: ufs: Fix some problems in task management request implementation
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Date: 2021-01-26 23:17:40
Also in:
lkml
On 1/20/21 7:23 PM, Can Guo wrote:
Current task management request send/compl implementation is broken, the
problems and fixes are listed as below:
Problem: TMR completion timeout. ufshcd_tmc_handler() calls
blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(fn == ufshcd_compl_tm()), but since
blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() only iterates over all reserved tags and
started requests, so ufshcd_compl_tm() never gets a chance to run.
Fix: Call blk_mq_start_request() in __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd().
Problem: Race condition in send/compl paths. ufshcd_compl_tm() looks for
all 0 bits in the REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL and call complete()
for each req who has the req->end_io_data set. There can be a race
condition btw tmc send/compl, because req->end_io_data is set, in
__ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(), without host lock protection, so it is
possible that when ufshcd_compl_tm() checks the req->end_io_data,
req->end_io_data is set but the corresponding tag has not been set
in the REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL. Thus, ufshcd_tmc_handler() may
wrongly complete TMRs which have not been sent.
Fix: Protect req->end_io_data with host lock. And let ufshcd_compl_tm()
only handle those tm cmds which have been completed instead of
looking for 0 bits in the REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL.
Problem: In __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(), it is not right to use hba->nutrs +
req->tag as the Task Tag in one TMR UPIU.
Fix: Directly use req->tag as Task Tag.Please split this patch into three separate patches - one patch per problem that has been described above. Thanks, Bart.