Current task management request send/compl implementation is broken, the
problems and fixes are listed as below:

Problem: TMR completion timeout. ufshcd_tmc_handler() calls
         blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter(fn == ufshcd_compl_tm()), but since
         blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() only iterates over all reserved tags and
         started requests, so ufshcd_compl_tm() never gets a chance to run.
Fix:     Call blk_mq_start_request() in __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd().

Problem: Race condition in send/compl paths. ufshcd_compl_tm() looks for
         all 0 bits in the REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL and call complete()
         for each req who has the req->end_io_data set. There can be a race
         condition btw tmc send/compl, because req->end_io_data is set, in
         __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(), without host lock protection, so it is
         possible that when ufshcd_compl_tm() checks the req->end_io_data,
         req->end_io_data is set but the corresponding tag has not been set
         in the REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL. Thus, ufshcd_tmc_handler()
may
         wrongly complete TMRs which have not been sent.
Fix:     Protect req->end_io_data with host lock. And let ufshcd_compl_tm()
         only handle those tm cmds which have been completed instead of
         looking for 0 bits in the REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL.

Problem: In __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(), it is not right to use hba->nutrs +
         req->tag as the Task Tag in one TMR UPIU.
Fix:     Directly use req->tag as Task Tag.

Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>

Since you are practically reverting Bart's change (69a6c269c097), maybe cc him as well,
And add a fixes tag?

Also, even though all those fixes are around the same place, but fixing different issues,
You might want to consider to separate those.  Whatever you think.

Thanks,
Avri