Thread (56 messages) 56 messages, 8 authors, 2022-01-14

Re: [PATCH v2 03/17] dt-bindings: soc/microchip: make systemcontroller a mfd

From: conor dooley <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-21 23:50:56
Also in: linux-crypto, linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, linux-i2c, linux-pwm, linux-riscv, linux-spi, linux-usb, lkml

On Tuesday, December 21st, 2021 at 17:55, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 09:33:11AM +0000, conor.dooley@microchip.com wrote:
quoted
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Make the system controller on the Polarfire SoC
a "simple,mfd" so that the services can be child
nodes of the system controller node.

Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
---
 .../microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml        | 33 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml b/>Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml
index f699772fedf3..014cb44b8f31 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/microchip,mpfs-sys-controller.yaml
@@ -13,13 +13,34 @@ description: |
   The PolarFire SoC system controller is communicated with via a mailbox.
   This document describes the bindings for the client portion of that mailbox.

-
 properties:
   mboxes:
     maxItems: 1

   compatible:
-    const: microchip,mpfs-sys-controller
+    items:
+      - const: microchip,mpfs-sys-controller
+      - const: simple-mfd
'simple-mfd' means there is zero dependency on the parent for the child
nodes. Isn't 'mboxes' a dependency?
I suppose it is. I was going off what had been done for the bcm2835
firmware for the rpi its also a mailbox providing "services".
(arm/bcm/raspberrypi,bcm2835-firmware.yaml)
quoted
+
+  hwrandom:
+    type: object
+
+    properties:
+      compatible:
+        const: microchip,mpfs-rng
+
+    required:
+      - compatible
+
+  sysserv:
+    type: object
+
+    properties:
+      compatible:
+        const: microchip,mpfs-generic-service
+
+    required:
+      - compatible
There's not really any need to have child nodes which have no resources.
The driver for microchip,mpfs-sys-controller can create child devices.
I am assuming by this you mean say, take a list of boolean properties and
convert those into child devices? There's a fairly decent number of services
provided by the system controller and these children just represent the
subset that we've implemented so far.

Conor
Rob
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help