RE: [PREEMPT_RT][PATCH] printk: Enhance the condition check of msleep in pr_flush()
flat view
From: Qin, Chao <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-02 06:08:50
Also in:
lkml
As John Ogness commented, I also found it would hang if sleep when >= SYSTEM_SCHEDULING. And as in commit https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20170516184736.272225698@linutronix.de/ (local), it should enable sleep right when the scheduler starts working(>= SYSTEM_RUNNING). -Chao. -----Original Message----- From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2021 10:47 PM To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Cc: Qin, Chao <redacted>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org; tglx@linutronix.de; rostedt@goodmis.org; mgross@linux.intel.com; Mei, Paul <redacted>; Li, Lili <redacted> Subject: Re: [PREEMPT_RT][PATCH] printk: Enhance the condition check of msleep in pr_flush() On 2021-07-30, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [off-list ref] wrote:
On 2021-07-19 17:01:51 [+0206], John Ogness wrote:quoted
On 2021-07-19, chao.qin@intel.com wrote:quoted
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c@@ -3620,7 +3620,8 @@ bool pr_flush(int timeout_ms, bool reset_on_progress) u64 diff; u64 seq; - may_sleep = (preemptible() && !in_softirq()); + may_sleep = (preemptible() && !in_softirq() + && (system_state >= SYSTEM_RUNNING));I don't have more context but scheduling should work starting with SYSTEM_SCHEDULING.
I also thought this, but a quick test shows that is not the case. For example, init/main.c:kernel_init() is called in preemptible context, but msleep() will hang if called at the beginning of that function. John Ogness