Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue

[PATCH RT 0/2] Linux v4.19.115-rt49-rc1 · zanussi@kernel.org · 2020-04-23
[PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · zanussi@kernel.org · 2020-04-23
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Ramon Fried <hidden> · 2020-06-04
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org> · 2020-06-04
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2020-06-09
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org> · 2020-06-09
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2020-06-09
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Ramon Fried <hidden> · 2020-06-09
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Ramon Fried <hidden> · 2020-06-09
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2020-06-09
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Ramon Fried <hidden> · 2020-06-09
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2020-06-09
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Ramon Fried <hidden> · 2020-06-09
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org> · 2020-06-09
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Ramon Fried <hidden> · 2020-06-09
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org> · 2020-06-09
Re: [PATCH RT 1/2] tasklet: Address a race resulting in double-enqueue · Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org> · 2020-06-09
[PATCH RT 2/2] Linux 4.19.115-rt49-rc1 · zanussi@kernel.org · 2020-04-23

From: Ramon Fried <hidden>
Date: 2020-06-09 17:07:14
Also in: lkml


On June 9, 2020 7:42:13 PM GMT+03:00, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [off-list ref] wrote:

On 2020-06-09 19:40:03 [+0300], Ramon Fried wrote:

quoted

Correction. normal kernel is running with RT enabled, crash kernel

without. 

no RT and no SMP in your crash kernel? So this information in your
first
email would have saved me some time…

Indeed
 I'm truly sorry, I thought our crash kernel is configured as RT as well. 
so, as I understand, if I build the RT kernel without preempt enabled I can hit this bug?

Sebastian

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help