Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64

poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Paul Thomas <hidden> · 2019-07-12
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Thomas Gleixner <hidden> · 2019-07-16
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Paul Thomas <hidden> · 2019-07-16
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Thomas Gleixner <hidden> · 2019-07-16
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Paul Thomas <hidden> · 2019-07-17
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Thomas Gleixner <hidden> · 2019-07-17
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Thomas Gleixner <hidden> · 2019-07-17
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Thomas Gleixner <hidden> · 2019-07-17
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Thomas Gleixner <hidden> · 2019-07-17
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Paul Thomas <hidden> · 2019-07-17
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2019-08-13
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Paul Thomas <hidden> · 2019-08-13
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2019-08-14
[PATCH RT] arm64: preempt: Check preemption level before looking at lazy-preempt · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2019-08-14
[PATCH RT] x86: preempt: Check preemption level before looking at lazy-preempt · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2019-08-14
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Paul Thomas <hidden> · 2019-08-14
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2019-08-15
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> · 2019-08-15
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Paul Thomas <hidden> · 2019-08-15
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2019-08-15
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Paul Thomas <hidden> · 2019-08-15
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2019-08-15
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Paul Thomas <hidden> · 2019-08-15
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2019-08-15
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Paul Thomas <hidden> · 2019-08-15
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Paul Thomas <hidden> · 2019-08-15
Re: poor cyclictest results with 5.0 series rt for arm64 · Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> · 2019-08-15

From: Paul Thomas <hidden>
Date: 2019-08-15 13:53:11

quoted

Emergency messages are not involved here. You can see at 84239098us that

Right, we don't have that. Let me boot my arm64, print something and
check how it goes…

Thanks! Nothing too crazy is happening with printk in my setup. Mostly
I just see systemd messages like this:
[55458.630872] systemd-journald[1072]: Sent WATCHDOG=1 notification.
[55578.632076] systemd-journald[1072]: Sent WATCHDOG=1 notification.

-Paul

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help