Re: [PATCH RT] Align rt_mutex inlining with upstream behavior
From: Alex Goins <hidden>
Date: 2017-02-10 19:14:41
Also in:
lkml
This should work.
Reviewed-by: Alex Goins [off-list ref]
Thanks,
Alex
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2017-02-10 10:09:29 [-0800], Andy Ritger wrote:quoted
Is the WARN_ON(rt_mutex_is_locked(lock)); in rt_mutex_destroy() valuable in non-CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES kernels, such that it would be better to always call it, and not noop away mutex_destroy() non-CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES kernels? I thought that was your objection to Alex's original patch.It kind of was… So first I removed the GPL symbol. Then I wasn't too happy about it especially since it was not introduced as part of RT. So I reverted that changed and aligned with mainline behaviour (the mutex_rt.h hunk). But then I noticed that with CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=n and CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y we still have a regression compared to !RT and this was the initial motivation to fix things. Then I got curious why mutex_lock() (which is essential rt_mutex_lock()) works and noticed the wrapper around it. And while looking at it I decided to go back to strip the GPL part from export symbol instead of adding a wrapper. And here I am. Then I was looking at the patch and decided to align with mainline (and keep that one hunk) in case Ingo ask for his GPL symbol.quoted
Thanks, - AndySebastian