Re: [PATCH RT] Align rt_mutex inlining with upstream behavior
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: 2017-02-10 18:28:22
Also in:
lkml
On 2017-02-03 08:49:24 [-0800], Andy Ritger wrote:
quoted
So your problem is simply that your non-GPL module can't link anymore with -RT. Would it help you if I simply replace the export for mutex_destroy with EXPORT_SYMBOL and leave it the function as is?Yes, definitely.
So this is what I intend to add to the RT patch and I hope Ingo won't object: Alex Goins reported that mutex_destroy() on RT will force a GPL only symbol which won't link and therefore fail on a non-GPL kernel module. This does not happen on !RT and is a regression on RT which we would like to avoid. I try here the easy thing and to not use rt_mutex_destroy() if CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is not enabled. This will still break for the DEBUG configs so instead of adding a wrapper around rt_mutex_destroy() (which we have for rt_mutex_lock() for instance) I am simply dropping the GPL part from the export. Reported-by: Alex Goins <redacted> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> --- include/linux/mutex_rt.h | 5 +++++ kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/mutex_rt.h
+++ b/include/linux/mutex_rt.h@@ -43,7 +43,12 @@ extern void __lockfunc _mutex_unlock(str #define mutex_lock_killable(l) _mutex_lock_killable(l) #define mutex_trylock(l) _mutex_trylock(l) #define mutex_unlock(l) _mutex_unlock(l) + +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES #define mutex_destroy(l) rt_mutex_destroy(&(l)->lock) +#else +static inline void mutex_destroy(struct mutex *lock) {} +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC # define mutex_lock_nested(l, s) _mutex_lock_nested(l, s) --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -2027,8 +2027,7 @@ void rt_mutex_destroy(struct rt_mutex *l lock->magic = NULL; #endif } - -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt_mutex_destroy); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_mutex_destroy); /** * __rt_mutex_init - initialize the rt lock
Sebastian