On Wed, 16 Mar 2016, Luiz Capitulino wrote:

On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:29:13 -0500
Luiz Capitulino [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

This is just a repost of my RFC posting with no changes.
I have tested it a bit more and I think it's good
for inclusion.

ping?

quoted

Original intro:

In short, this series allows you to run cyclictest under
trace-cmd and still get trace marks when the latency
specified with -b is execeded. More details in patch 4/4.

This series is RFC because I'm not completely sure this
is the right thing to do. I'm wondering if we shouldn't
ditch all tracing support from cyclictest...

Luiz Capitulino (4):
  cyclictest: tracing(): check for notrace
  cyclictest: move debugfs init code to its own function
  cyclictest: move tracemark_fd handling to its own function
  cyclictest: add --tracemark option

 src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--

I'll have a closer look tomorrow, but these look okay.

John