Re: [PATCH 0/4] cyclictest: improve running under trace-cmd
From: Luiz Capitulino <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-16 21:23:25
From: Luiz Capitulino <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-16 21:23:25
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:29:13 -0500 Luiz Capitulino [off-list ref] wrote:
This is just a repost of my RFC posting with no changes. I have tested it a bit more and I think it's good for inclusion.
ping?
Original intro: In short, this series allows you to run cyclictest under trace-cmd and still get trace marks when the latency specified with -b is execeded. More details in patch 4/4. This series is RFC because I'm not completely sure this is the right thing to do. I'm wondering if we shouldn't ditch all tracing support from cyclictest... Luiz Capitulino (4): cyclictest: tracing(): check for notrace cyclictest: move debugfs init code to its own function cyclictest: move tracemark_fd handling to its own function cyclictest: add --tracemark option src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)