Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 2 authors, 2016-03-17

Re: [PATCH 0/4] cyclictest: improve running under trace-cmd

From: Luiz Capitulino <hidden>
Date: 2016-03-16 21:23:25

On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 11:29:13 -0500
Luiz Capitulino [off-list ref] wrote:
This is just a repost of my RFC posting with no changes.
I have tested it a bit more and I think it's good
for inclusion.
ping?
Original intro:

In short, this series allows you to run cyclictest under
trace-cmd and still get trace marks when the latency
specified with -b is execeded. More details in patch 4/4.

This series is RFC because I'm not completely sure this
is the right thing to do. I'm wondering if we shouldn't
ditch all tracing support from cyclictest...

Luiz Capitulino (4):
  cyclictest: tracing(): check for notrace
  cyclictest: move debugfs init code to its own function
  cyclictest: move tracemark_fd handling to its own function
  cyclictest: add --tracemark option

 src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help