On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:10:56PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:09:23PM +0100, Kevin Hilman wrote:

quoted

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 04:39:37PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:

quoted

* Anders Roxell | 2015-04-27 22:53:08 [+0200]:

quoted

Mark the PMU interrupts as non-threadable, as is the case with
arch/arm: d9c3365 ARM: 7813/1: Mark pmu interupt IRQF_NO_THREAD

Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <redacted>

Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

Could this please go via the arm64 tree?

I already acked it:

  https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/23/161

so it will be picked up for 4.2.

Which tree is at applied to?  I'm not seeing it in -next, and couldn't
find it in any branches of the arm64 tree[1].  Sorry to pester, I'm
just looking to cherry-pick it from it's proper upstream for testing
with a stable/3.18 based kernel.

I don't think Catalin has started putting together our for-next/core branch
yet, but I'd expect it to appear there when he picks it up.

I'll push it out after -rc4 (i.e. next week).

-- 
Catalin