Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 5 authors, 2015-05-18

Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] arm64: Mark PMU interrupt IRQF_NO_THREAD

From: Will Deacon <hidden>
Date: 2015-05-14 17:10:56
Also in: linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:09:23PM +0100, Kevin Hilman wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 04:39:37PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
quoted
* Anders Roxell | 2015-04-27 22:53:08 [+0200]:
quoted
Mark the PMU interrupts as non-threadable, as is the case with
arch/arm: d9c3365 ARM: 7813/1: Mark pmu interupt IRQF_NO_THREAD

Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <redacted>
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

Could this please go via the arm64 tree?
I already acked it:

  https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/23/161

so it will be picked up for 4.2.
Which tree is at applied to?  I'm not seeing it in -next, and couldn't
find it in any branches of the arm64 tree[1].  Sorry to pester, I'm
just looking to cherry-pick it from it's proper upstream for testing
with a stable/3.18 based kernel.
I don't think Catalin has started putting together our for-next/core branch
yet, but I'd expect it to appear there when he picks it up.

Will
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help