Thread (28 messages) 28 messages, 9 authors, 2012-11-14

Re: [PATCH 09/11] slab, lockdep: Fix silly bug

From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Date: 2011-12-05 13:04:59
Also in: linux-mm, lkml

On Sun, 4 Dec 2011, Steven Rostedt wrote:
--00GvhwF7k39YY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

From: Peter Zijlstra <redacted>

Commit 30765b92 ("slab, lockdep: Annotate the locks before using
them") moves the init_lock_keys() call from after g_cpucache_up =3D
FULL, to before it. And overlooks the fact that init_node_lock_keys()
tests for it and ignores everything !FULL.

Introduce a LATE stage and change the lockdep test to be <LATE.

Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <redacted>
Cc: Hans Schillstrom <redacted>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <redacted>
Cc: Matt Mackall <redacted>
Cc: Sitsofe Wheeler <redacted>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-gadqbdfxorhia1w5ewmoiodd@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Your emails seem to be damaged in interesting ways.

I assume the patch is going through the lockdep tree? If so, please make 
sure you include Christoph's ACK in the changelog.

 			Pekka
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help