Re: [PATCH -rt] ipc/sem: Rework semaphore wakeups
From: Mike Galbraith <hidden>
Date: 2011-09-14 13:02:25
Also in:
lkml
All better. On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 11:57 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Subject: ipc/sem: Rework semaphore wakeups From: Peter Zijlstra <redacted> Date: Tue Sep 13 15:09:40 CEST 2011 Current sysv sems have a weird ass wakeup scheme that involves keeping preemption disabled over a potential O(n^2) loop and busy waiting on that on other CPUs. Kill this and simply wake the task directly from under the sem_lock. This was discovered by a migrate_disable() debug feature that disallows: spin_lock(); preempt_disable(); spin_unlock() preempt_enable(); Cc: Manfred Spraul <redacted> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <redacted> Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <redacted> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <redacted> --- ipc/sem.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) Index: linux-rt/ipc/sem.c ===================================================================--- linux-rt.orig/ipc/sem.c +++ linux-rt/ipc/sem.c@@ -415,6 +415,13 @@ static int try_atomic_semop (struct sem_ static void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(struct list_head *pt, struct sem_queue *q, int error) { +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_BASE + struct task_struct *p = q->sleeper; + get_task_struct(p); + q->status = error; + wake_up_process(p); + put_task_struct(p); +#else if (list_empty(pt)) { /* * Hold preempt off so that we don't get preempted and have the@@ -426,6 +433,7 @@ static void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(st q->pid = error; list_add_tail(&q->simple_list, pt); +#endif } /**@@ -439,6 +447,7 @@ static void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(st */ static void wake_up_sem_queue_do(struct list_head *pt) { +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_BASE struct sem_queue *q, *t; int did_something;@@ -451,6 +460,7 @@ static void wake_up_sem_queue_do(struct } if (did_something) preempt_enable(); +#endif } static void unlink_queue(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q)