Thread (46 messages) 46 messages, 6 authors, 2011-09-22

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.4-rt13

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: 2011-09-13 13:37:15
Also in: lkml

On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 16:53 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 15:52 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
quoted
36717            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543129: sys_semop <-system_call_fastpath
36718            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543129: sys_semtimedop <-sys_semop
36719            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543131: ipc_lock_check <-sys_semtimedop
36720            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543131: ipc_lock <-ipc_lock_check
36721            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543132: __rcu_read_lock <-ipc_lock
36722            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543133: migrate_disable <-ipc_lock
36723            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543134: migrate_disable: migrate_disable: in_atomic:0 p->migrate_disable_atomic:0 p->migrate_disable:0
36724            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543134: pin_current_cpu <-migrate_disable
36725            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543134: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave <-migrate_disable
36726            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543135: _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore <-migrate_disable
36727            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543135: rt_spin_lock <-ipc_lock
36728            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543136: ipcperms <-sys_semtimedop
36729            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543137: ns_capable <-ipcperms
36730            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543138: cap_capable <-ns_capable
36731            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543138: pid_vnr <-sys_semtimedop
36732            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543139: try_atomic_semop <-sys_semtimedop
36733            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543140: do_smart_update <-sys_semtimedop
36734            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543140: update_queue <-do_smart_update
36735            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543141: try_atomic_semop <-update_queue
36736            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543142: update_queue <-do_smart_update
36737            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543142: try_atomic_semop <-update_queue
36738            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543143: update_queue <-do_smart_update
36739            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543143: try_atomic_semop <-update_queue
36740            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543144: get_seconds <-do_smart_update
36741            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543144: rt_spin_unlock <-sys_semtimedop
36742            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543144: migrate_enable <-sys_semtimedop
36743            <...>-6266  [002]   242.543145: migrate_enable: migrate_enable: in_atomic:1 p->migrate_disable_atomic:0 p->migrate_disable:1
Hm.  Seems this is home grown a non-preemptive wakeup in the making.
Does the below cure things? It breaks !rt builds, but we can cure that if it works..

---
 include/linux/sem.h |    2 ++
 ipc/sem.c           |   20 ++++----------------
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Index: linux-rt/include/linux/sem.h
===================================================================
--- linux-rt.orig/include/linux/sem.h
+++ linux-rt/include/linux/sem.h
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct  seminfo {
 #include <asm/atomic.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <linux/cache.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
 
 struct task_struct;
 
@@ -114,6 +115,7 @@ struct sem_queue {
 	struct sembuf		*sops;	 /* array of pending operations */
 	int			nsops;	 /* number of operations */
 	int			alter;   /* does the operation alter the array? */
+	wait_queue_head_t	wait;
 };
 
 /* Each task has a list of undo requests. They are executed automatically
Index: linux-rt/ipc/sem.c
===================================================================
--- linux-rt.orig/ipc/sem.c
+++ linux-rt/ipc/sem.c
@@ -415,13 +415,6 @@ static int try_atomic_semop (struct sem_
 static void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(struct list_head *pt,
 				struct sem_queue *q, int error)
 {
-	if (list_empty(pt)) {
-		/*
-		 * Hold preempt off so that we don't get preempted and have the
-		 * wakee busy-wait until we're scheduled back on.
-		 */
-		preempt_disable();
-	}
 	q->status = IN_WAKEUP;
 	q->pid = error;
 
@@ -450,7 +443,7 @@ static void wake_up_sem_queue_do(struct
 		q->status = q->pid;
 	}
 	if (did_something)
-		preempt_enable();
+		wake_up_all(&q->wait);
 }
 
 static void unlink_queue(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q)
@@ -1275,15 +1268,9 @@ static struct sem_undo *find_alloc_undo(
  */
 static int get_queue_result(struct sem_queue *q)
 {
-	int error;
-
-	error = q->status;
-	while (unlikely(error == IN_WAKEUP)) {
-		cpu_relax();
-		error = q->status;
-	}
+	wait_event(q->wait, ACCESS_ONCE(q->status) != IN_WAKEUP);
 
-	return error;
+	return q->status;
 }
 
 
@@ -1432,6 +1419,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid,
 
 	queue.status = -EINTR;
 	queue.sleeper = current;
+	init_waitqueue_head(&queue.wait);
 	current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
 	sem_unlock(sma);
 
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help