Re: [000/474] 2.6.33.8-longterm review
From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2011-03-20 12:53:01
Also in:
lkml
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Remy Bohmer wrote:
Hi, 2011/3/18 Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref]:quoted
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Greg KH wrote:quoted
Yeah, I know what you are thinking, "What, 2.6.33, are you crazy?"Aren't we all crazy ?quoted
I'd prefer it if you didn't answer that question...Too late. You should have put this before the question.quoted
So, if you are using .33, please give this patch a test and let me know if I've messed up anything (hint, I think I did, it's up to you to figure it out, consider it a test to see if anyone actually cares about this kernel version.)We'll pull it into rt and figure out what breaks.Can you please elaborate somewhat on the status of the RT-patchset development for 2.6.38 and on?
Working on it.
It is silent about it for quite a while now, and actually the gap between mainstream and the latest RT has never been this big before... Are there major complications, lack on time or hands? Can I help ?
I concentrated on getting stuff upstream and reworking to make it more palatable and maintainable. Thanks, tglx