Hi,
2011/3/18 Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref]:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Greg KH wrote:
quoted
Yeah, I know what you are thinking, "What, 2.6.33, are you crazy?"
Aren't we all crazy ?
quoted
I'd prefer it if you didn't answer that question...
Too late. You should have put this before the question.
quoted
So, if you are using .33, please give this patch a test and let me know
if I've messed up anything (hint, I think I did, it's up to you to
figure it out, consider it a test to see if anyone actually cares about
this kernel version.)
We'll pull it into rt and figure out what breaks.
Can you please elaborate somewhat on the status of the RT-patchset
development for 2.6.38 and on?
It is silent about it for quite a while now, and actually the gap
between mainstream and the latest RT has never been this big before...
Are there major complications, lack on time or hands? Can I help ?
Thanks for the all the effort,
Kind regards,
Remy
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Remy Bohmer wrote:
Hi,
2011/3/18 Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref]:
quoted
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Greg KH wrote:
quoted
Yeah, I know what you are thinking, "What, 2.6.33, are you crazy?"
Aren't we all crazy ?
quoted
I'd prefer it if you didn't answer that question...
Too late. You should have put this before the question.
quoted
So, if you are using .33, please give this patch a test and let me know
if I've messed up anything (hint, I think I did, it's up to you to
figure it out, consider it a test to see if anyone actually cares about
this kernel version.)
We'll pull it into rt and figure out what breaks.
Can you please elaborate somewhat on the status of the RT-patchset
development for 2.6.38 and on?
Working on it.
It is silent about it for quite a while now, and actually the gap
between mainstream and the latest RT has never been this big before...
Are there major complications, lack on time or hands? Can I help ?
I concentrated on getting stuff upstream and reworking to make it more
palatable and maintainable.
Thanks,
tglx
Il 20/03/2011 13:52, Thomas Gleixner ha scritto:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Remy Bohmer wrote:
quoted
Can you please elaborate somewhat on the status of the RT-patchset
development for 2.6.38 and on?
Working on it.
quoted
It is silent about it for quite a while now, and actually the gap
between mainstream and the latest RT has never been this big before...
Are there major complications, lack on time or hands? Can I help ?
I concentrated on getting stuff upstream and reworking to make it more
palatable and maintainable.
Is there a working (where working means working for testing purposes)
snapshot somewhere?
Thanks,
Darkbasic