Thread (48 messages) 48 messages, 7 authors, 2023-05-31
STALE1152d REVIEWED: 6 (5M)
Revisions (5)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v5 [diff vs current]
  4. v6 current
  5. v7 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v6 11/20] zram: use __bio_add_page for adding single page to bio

From: Johannes Thumshirn <hidden>
Date: 2023-05-30 15:50:16
Also in: dm-devel, linux-block, linux-fsdevel, linux-mm
Subsystem: block layer, the rest, zram compressed ram block device drvier · Maintainers: Jens Axboe, Linus Torvalds, Minchan Kim, Sergey Senozhatsky

The zram writeback code uses bio_add_page() to add a page to a newly
created bio. bio_add_page() can fail, but the return value is never
checked.

Use __bio_add_page() as adding a single page to a newly created bio is
guaranteed to succeed.

This brings us a step closer to marking bio_add_page() as __must_check.

Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <redacted>
---
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index f6d90f1ba5cf..b86691d2133e 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static ssize_t writeback_store(struct device *dev,
 		bio_init(&bio, zram->bdev, &bio_vec, 1,
 			 REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_SYNC);
 		bio.bi_iter.bi_sector = blk_idx * (PAGE_SIZE >> 9);
-		bio_add_page(&bio, page, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
+		__bio_add_page(&bio, page, PAGE_SIZE, 0);
 
 		/*
 		 * XXX: A single page IO would be inefficient for write
-- 
2.40.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help