Thread (25 messages) flat view 25 messages, 4 authors, 2022-01-26

Re: [PATCH 1/3] raid0, linear, md: add error_handlers for raid0 and linear

From: Mariusz Tkaczyk <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-20 08:45:49

Hi Xiao,

On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 11:20:59 +0800
Xiao Ni [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Usage of error_handler causes that disk failure can be requested
from userspace. User can fail the array via #mdadm --set-faulty
command. This is not safe and will be fixed in mdadm. It is
correctable because failed state is not recorded in the metadata.
After next assembly array will be read-write again. For safety
reason is better to keep MD_BROKEN in runtime only.  
Hi Mariusz

Let me call them chapter[1-4]

Could you explain more about 'mdadm --set-faulty' part? I've read this
patch. But I don't
know the relationship between the patch and chapter4.

In patch2, you write "As in previous commit, it causes that #mdadm
--set-faulty is able to
mark array as failed." I tried to run command `mdadm /dev/md0 -f
/dev/sda`. md0 is a raid0.
It can't remove sda from md0.
Did you test kernel with my patchset applied?

I've added chapter 4 because I'm aware of behavior change.
Now for r0, nothing happens when we are trying to write failure to
md/<disk>/state.
 
After the change, drive is not remove too, but MD_BROKEN is set and
any new write will be rejected. The drive will be still visible
in array (I didn't change that). Should I add it to description?

Thanks,
Mariusz
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help