On Thu 10-09-20 16:48:26, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Drivers shouldn't really mess with the readahead size, as that is a VM
concept. Instead set it based on the optimal I/O size by lifting the
algorithm from the md driver when registering the disk. Also set
bdi->io_pages there as well by applying the same scheme based on
max_sectors.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
block/blk-settings.c | 5 ++---
block/blk-sysfs.c | 10 +++++++++-
block/genhd.c | 5 +++--
drivers/block/aoe/aoeblk.c | 2 --
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c | 12 +-----------
drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 4 ----
drivers/md/dm-table.c | 3 ---
drivers/md/raid0.c | 16 ----------------
drivers/md/raid10.c | 24 +-----------------------
drivers/md/raid5.c | 13 +------------
10 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
index 76a7e03bcd6cac..01049e9b998f1d 100644
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -452,6 +452,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_limits_io_opt);
void blk_queue_io_opt(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int opt)
{
blk_limits_io_opt(&q->limits, opt);
+ q->backing_dev_info->ra_pages =
+ max(queue_io_opt(q) * 2 / PAGE_SIZE, VM_READAHEAD_PAGES);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_io_opt);
@@ -628,9 +630,6 @@ void disk_stack_limits(struct gendisk *disk, struct block_device *bdev,
printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: Warning: Device %s is misaligned\n",
top, bottom);
}
-
- t->backing_dev_info->io_pages =
- t->limits.max_sectors >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 9);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(disk_stack_limits);
diff --git a/block/blk-sysfs.c b/block/blk-sysfs.c
index 81722cdcf0cb21..95eb35324e1a61 100644
--- a/block/blk-sysfs.c
+++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c
@@ -245,7 +245,6 @@ queue_max_sectors_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *page, size_t count)
spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
q->limits.max_sectors = max_sectors_kb << 1;
- q->backing_dev_info->io_pages = max_sectors_kb >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10);
spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
So do I get it right that readahead won't now be limited if you store lower
value to max_sectors? Why? I'd consider io_pages a "cached value" of
max_sectors and thus expect it to change together with max_sectors...
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -854,6 +853,15 @@ int blk_register_queue(struct gendisk *disk)
percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu(&q->q_usage_counter);
}
+ /*
+ * For read-ahead of large files to be effective, we need to read ahead
+ * at least twice the optimal I/O size.
+ */
+ q->backing_dev_info->ra_pages =
+ max(queue_io_opt(q) * 2 / PAGE_SIZE, VM_READAHEAD_PAGES);
+ q->backing_dev_info->io_pages =
+ queue_max_sectors(q) >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 9);
+
ret = blk_trace_init_sysfs(dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index 081f1039d9367f..db311a14ddc71a 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -772,6 +772,7 @@ static void __device_add_disk(struct device *parent, struct gendisk *disk,
const struct attribute_group **groups,
bool register_queue)
{
+ struct request_queue *q = disk->queue;
dev_t devt;
int retval;
@@ -782,7 +783,7 @@ static void __device_add_disk(struct device *parent, struct gendisk *disk,
* registration.
*/
if (register_queue)
- elevator_init_mq(disk->queue);
+ elevator_init_mq(q);
/* minors == 0 indicates to use ext devt from part0 and should
* be accompanied with EXT_DEVT flag. Make sure all
@@ -812,7 +813,7 @@ static void __device_add_disk(struct device *parent, struct gendisk *disk,
disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_SUPPRESS_PARTITION_INFO;
disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
} else {
- struct backing_dev_info *bdi = disk->queue->backing_dev_info;
+ struct backing_dev_info *bdi = q->backing_dev_info;
struct device *dev = disk_to_dev(disk);
int ret;
Not sure how/why these changes got here... Not that I care too much :)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/block/aoe/aoeblk.c b/drivers/block/aoe/aoeblk.c
index 5ca7216e9e01f3..89b33b402b4e52 100644
--- a/drivers/block/aoe/aoeblk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/aoe/aoeblk.c
@@ -347,7 +347,6 @@ aoeblk_gdalloc(void *vp)
mempool_t *mp;
struct request_queue *q;
struct blk_mq_tag_set *set;
- enum { KB = 1024, MB = KB * KB, READ_AHEAD = 2 * MB, };
ulong flags;
int late = 0;
int err;@@ -407,7 +406,6 @@ aoeblk_gdalloc(void *vp)
WARN_ON(d->gd);
WARN_ON(d->flags & DEVFL_UP);
blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(q, BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS);
- q->backing_dev_info->ra_pages = READ_AHEAD / PAGE_SIZE;
d->bufpool = mp;
d->blkq = gd->queue = q;
q->queuedata = d;
Shouldn't AOE set 2MB optimal IO size so that readahead is equivalent to
previous behavior?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
index 1bbdc410ee3c51..ff2101d56cd7f1 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
@@ -1427,10 +1427,6 @@ static int cached_dev_init(struct cached_dev *dc, unsigned int block_size)
if (ret)
return ret;
- dc->disk.disk->queue->backing_dev_info->ra_pages =
- max(dc->disk.disk->queue->backing_dev_info->ra_pages,
- q->backing_dev_info->ra_pages);
-
So bcache is basically stacking readahead here on top of underlying cache
device. I don't see this being replicated by your patch so it is lost now?
Probably this should be replaced by properly inheriting optimal IO size?
Honza
--
Jan Kara [off-list ref]
SUSE Labs, CR