Re: RAID5 up, but one drive removed, one says spare building, what now?
From: Jun-Kai Teoh <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-10 18:15:02
On Nov 10, 2017, at 10:01 AM, Phil Turmel [off-list ref] wrote: Hi Jun-Kai, {Convention on kernel.org is to trim replies and avoid top-posting.} On 11/10/2017 12:25 PM, Jun-Kai Teoh wrote:quoted
I was reshaping/growing my array when it died. Computer came back up but array wouldn't assemble. I looked around and saw some commands on how to assemble without the one drive that looked like it was kicked off sometime ago that I did not realize (I used --assemble --force --verbose) I kept getting the error that there were 6 drives, 1 rebuilding, and not enough to get the array up. I unplugged the one drive that had the incorrect superblock and ran "mdadm -A -R". It ran and looked like it was resuming reshaping but it got really slow - like 7 years slow. I killed the process, rebooted the machine, and it just auto reassembled the array and automounted it on boot. Am in the process of backup right now. And yes, the drive/array is mounted.Ok. I reviewed the other thread. Consider creating a new array from scratch after you complete your backups, using consistent partitioning across all devices. I would put LVM on top and leave part of it unallocated (for emergencies), but that's just my preference. Phil
My apologies all! I did not know this. I'm backing up as much as I can, but I don't think I'll be able to back up everything. I can back up very little of the data, so I'm trying to prioritize carefully right now. All devices are just 4TB drives, I didn't partition them separately for the array - or am I misunderstanding what you mean? <-- This is really common, all of you are far more knowledgeable than I am and I only understand some of the terms sometimes.