Re: RAID5 up, but one drive removed, one says spare building, what now?
From: Phil Turmel <hidden>
Date: 2017-11-10 13:01:21
Hi Jun-Kai, On 11/10/2017 06:31 AM, Wols Lists wrote:
On 10/11/17 03:09, Jun-Kai Teoh wrote:quoted
Hi all, I managed to get my RAID drive back up, content looks like it's still there, but it's not resyncing or reshaping and my parity drive was removed (I did it when I tried to get it back up).
If you can see your content (mounted read-only, I hope), backup up everything, in order from most critical to least critical.
quoted
So what should I do now? I'm afraid of doing anything else at this point.
Well, you need to provide more information. At least the mdadm -E reports for all of the member devices. Including the "parity" device you removed. (Parity is spread among all devices in a normal raid5 layout, so you may be suffering from a misunderstanding.)
quoted
/dev/md126: Version : 1.2 Creation Time : Thu Jun 30 07:57:36 2016 Raid Level : raid5 Array Size : 23441323008 (22355.39 GiB 24003.91 GB) Used Dev Size : 3906887168 (3725.90 GiB 4000.65 GB) Raid Devices : 8 Total Devices : 7 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Intent Bitmap : Internal Update Time : Thu Nov 9 18:57:18 2017 State : clean, FAILED Active Devices : 6 Working Devices : 7 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 1 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 512K Delta Devices : 1, (7->8)
^^^^^^ Somewhere in your efforts, you must have used mdadm --grow. That was bad, and the reason for my suggestion above. Please review your bash history and reconstruct what steps you took in your efforts to revive your array. An extract of relevant dmesg text from that time period may be helpful, too. It would help if you summarized how you got into this jam in the first place. [trim /]
Okay. I was hoping someone else would chime in, but I'd say this looks well promising. You have seven drives of eight so you have no redundancy :-( You say your data is still there - does that mean you've mounted it, and it looks okay? sde is rebuilding, which means the array is sorting itself out.
It's not progressing, because of the reshape.
You need that eighth drive. If a fsck says you have no (or almost no) filesystem corruption, and you have a known-good drive, add it in. The array will then sort itself out.
No, backups are first.
I would NOT recommend mounting it read-write until it comes back and says "eight drives of eight working".
Concur. Phil