Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
From: Roberto Spadim <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-18 17:33:03
Well the internet link here is 100mbps, i think the workload will be a bit more than only 100 users, it's a second webserver+database server He is trying to use a cheaper server with more disk performace, Brazil costs are too high to allow a full ssd system or 15k rpm sas harddisks For mariadb server i'm studing if the thread-pool scheduler will be used instead of one thread per connection but "it's not my problem" the final user will select what is better for database scheduler In other words i think the work load will not be a simple web server cms/blog, i don't know yet how it will work, it's a black/gray box to me, today he have sata enterprise hdd 7200rpm at servers (dell server r420 if i'm not wrong) and is studing if a ssd could help, that's my 'job' (hobby) in this task 2013/9/18 Drew [off-list ref]:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Roberto Spadim [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Sorry guys, this time i don't have a full knowledge about the workload, but from what he told me, he want fast writes with hdd but i could check if small ssd devices could help After install linux with raid1 i will install apache mariadb and php at this machine, in other words it's a database and web server load, but i don't know what size of app and database will run yet Btw, ssd with bcache or dm cache could help hdd (this must be enterprise level) writes, right? Any idea what the best method to test what kernel drive could give superior performace? I'm thinking about install the bcache, and after make a backup and install dm cache and check what's better, any other idea?We still need to know what size datasets are going to be used. And also given it's a webserver, how big of a pipe does he have? Given a typical webserver in a colo w/ 10Mbps pipe, I think the suggested config is overkill. For a webserver the 7200 SATA's should be able to deliver enough data to keep apache happy. In the database side, depends on how intensive the workload is. I see a lot of webservers where the 7200's are just fine because the I/O demands from the database are low. Blog/CMS systems like wordpress will be harder on the database but again it depends on how heavy the access is to the server. How many visitors/hour does he expect to serve? -- Drew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- Roberto Spadim