Re: Failed to find backup of critical section
From: Nathan Shearer <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-01 10:25:44
On Sun, 01 Sep 2013 02:56:12 -0600 Nathan Shearer[off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi, I've run into a problem recovering my array from a server power failure. I'll try to keep it short so here is a sequence of events: 1. Running a healthy 4-disk RAID5 array (on server-01). 2. Added a 5th drive and grow the array to a 5-disk RAID6 array (backup file stored on a separate RAID1 array on other disks) 3. Grow begins and passes the critical section, gets to ~15% complete and power to the server failsWhen growing a 4-disk RAID5 to a 5-disk RAID6 the entire process is in the "critical section". This is because it is always writing to location where live data is. When increasing the number of data drives there is a short critical section at the start. When decreasing the number of data drives there is a short critical section at the end. But when you don't change the number of data drives as in this case, it is all critical and all needs a backup.quoted
4. I then move all 5 drives to backup server. The RAID5/6 array assembles and grow continues (without backup file since it's on server-01)That shouldn't work. It shouldn't start without the backup file.quoted
5. I begin copying data off of that array onto a separate array -- filesystem and data is consistent :) 6. Power restored to server-01 7. Safely stop the growing array with mdadm --stop 8. Move 5 drives back into server-01 9. Attempt mdadm --assemble and I get: # mdadm --assemble /dev/md9 mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry. Possibly you needed to specify the --backup-fileThat should have happened on server-02quoted
10. Attempt with the original backup file: # mdadm --assemble /dev/md9 --backup-file /mnt/temp/raid-reshape-backup-file mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry. So when I enable --verbose I get: mdadm:/dev/md9 has an active reshape - checking if critical section needs to be restored mdadm: Failed to find backup of critical section mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry. Possibly you needed to specify the --backup-file When I provide the backup file I get: mdadm:/dev/md9 has an active reshape - checking if critical section needs to be restored mdadm: too-old timestamp on backup-metadata on /mnt/temp/raid-reshape-backup-file mdadm: Failed to find backup of critical section mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry. When I tell it to use the "old" backup file I get: # export MDADM_GROW_ALLOW_OLD=1 # mdadm --assemble /dev/md9 -vv --backup-file /mnt/temp/raid-reshape-backup-file mdadm:/dev/md9 has an active reshape - checking if critical section needs to be restored mdadm: accepting backup with timestamp 1377794387 for array with timestamp 1377904444 mdadm: backup-metadata found on /mnt/temp/raid-reshape-backup-file but is not needed mdadm: Failed to find backup of critical section mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry. OK, so the backup file is not needed. I assume this is because the critical section was passed long ago, but then why is it attempting to find and restore the backup file when it is provided and also not needed? I have not tried a --force because I don't want to trash my array if there is another better option that I can still try. Any ideas? Is this potentially a bug in mdadm where this kind of array state is not expected?The content of the backup file is not needed as it is (presumably) before the place where the reshape has proceeded to. The backup is only needed after an unclean shutdown. Presumably you had an unclean shutdown when server-01 lost power, so that could have resulted in corruption and shouldn't have restarted easily on server-02. However as the shutdown on server-02 was clean there would be no further corruption. You can start the array by giving a backup file (it can be empty) and specifying --invalid-backup. This tells mdadm not to bother if it cannot restore the critical section but to just keep going. NeilBrown
I must be confused on the order of events then -- it's been a busy week.
Just for the record (in case anybody else runs into a similar problem
searching the e-mail archive), the --invalid-backup option did start the
array for me. I used the original backup file that was created instead
of creating a blank one like Neil suggested.
# mdadm --assemble /dev/md3 --backup-file
/root/raid-reshape-backup-file --invalid-backup --verbose
mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md3
mdadm: /dev/sdf3 is identified as a member of /dev/md3, slot 0.
mdadm: /dev/sde3 is identified as a member of /dev/md3, slot 1.
mdadm: /dev/sdd3 is identified as a member of /dev/md3, slot 3.
mdadm: /dev/sdc3 is identified as a member of /dev/md3, slot 2.
mdadm: /dev/sdb3 is identified as a member of /dev/md3, slot 4.
mdadm:/dev/md3 has an active reshape - checking if critical section
needs to be restored
mdadm: accepting backup with timestamp 1377794387 for array with
timestamp 1377904444
mdadm: backup-metadata found on /root/raid-reshape-backup-file but
is not needed
mdadm: Failed to find backup of critical section
mdadm: continuing without restoring backup
mdadm: added /dev/sde3 to /dev/md3 as 1
mdadm: added /dev/sdc3 to /dev/md3 as 2
mdadm: added /dev/sdd3 to /dev/md3 as 3
mdadm: added /dev/sdb3 to /dev/md3 as 4
mdadm: added /dev/sdf3 to /dev/md3 as 0
mdadm: /dev/md3 has been started with 4 drives (out of 5) and 1
rebuilding.
# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md3 : active raid6 sdf3[5] sdb3[6] sdd3[4] sdc3[2] sde3[1]
8587336140 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 4k chunk, algorithm 18
[5/4] [UUUU_]
[==========>..........] reshape = 54.8%
(1570055672/2862445380) finish=9347.2min speed=2304K/sec
unused devices: <none>