Re: Failed to find backup of critical section
From: NeilBrown <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-01 09:21:49
On Sun, 01 Sep 2013 02:56:12 -0600 Nathan Shearer [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi, I've run into a problem recovering my array from a server power
failure. I'll try to keep it short so here is a sequence of events:
1. Running a healthy 4-disk RAID5 array (on server-01).
2. Added a 5th drive and grow the array to a 5-disk RAID6 array (backup
file stored on a separate RAID1 array on other disks)
3. Grow begins and passes the critical section, gets to ~15% complete
and power to the server failsWhen growing a 4-disk RAID5 to a 5-disk RAID6 the entire process is in the "critical section". This is because it is always writing to location where live data is. When increasing the number of data drives there is a short critical section at the start. When decreasing the number of data drives there is a short critical section at the end. But when you don't change the number of data drives as in this case, it is all critical and all needs a backup.
4. I then move all 5 drives to backup server. The RAID5/6 array
assembles and grow continues (without backup file since it's on
server-01)That shouldn't work. It shouldn't start without the backup file.
5. I begin copying data off of that array onto a separate array --
filesystem and data is consistent :)
6. Power restored to server-01
7. Safely stop the growing array with mdadm --stop
8. Move 5 drives back into server-01
9. Attempt mdadm --assemble and I get:
# mdadm --assemble /dev/md9
mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
Possibly you needed to specify the --backup-fileThat should have happened on server-02
10. Attempt with the original backup file:
# mdadm --assemble /dev/md9 --backup-file
/mnt/temp/raid-reshape-backup-file
mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
So when I enable --verbose I get:
mdadm:/dev/md9 has an active reshape - checking if critical section
needs to be restored
mdadm: Failed to find backup of critical section
mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
Possibly you needed to specify the --backup-file
When I provide the backup file I get:
mdadm:/dev/md9 has an active reshape - checking if critical section
needs to be restored
mdadm: too-old timestamp on backup-metadata on
/mnt/temp/raid-reshape-backup-file
mdadm: Failed to find backup of critical section
mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
When I tell it to use the "old" backup file I get:
# export MDADM_GROW_ALLOW_OLD=1
# mdadm --assemble /dev/md9 -vv --backup-file
/mnt/temp/raid-reshape-backup-file
mdadm:/dev/md9 has an active reshape - checking if critical section
needs to be restored
mdadm: accepting backup with timestamp 1377794387 for array with
timestamp 1377904444
mdadm: backup-metadata found on /mnt/temp/raid-reshape-backup-file
but is not needed
mdadm: Failed to find backup of critical section
mdadm: Failed to restore critical section for reshape, sorry.
OK, so the backup file is not needed. I assume this is because the
critical section was passed long ago, but then why is it attempting to
find and restore the backup file when it is provided and also not
needed? I have not tried a --force because I don't want to trash my
array if there is another better option that I can still try. Any ideas?
Is this potentially a bug in mdadm where this kind of array state is not
expected?The content of the backup file is not needed as it is (presumably) before the place where the reshape has proceeded to. The backup is only needed after an unclean shutdown. Presumably you had an unclean shutdown when server-01 lost power, so that could have resulted in corruption and shouldn't have restarted easily on server-02. However as the shutdown on server-02 was clean there would be no further corruption. You can start the array by giving a backup file (it can be empty) and specifying --invalid-backup. This tells mdadm not to bother if it cannot restore the critical section but to just keep going. NeilBrown
Attachments
- signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 828 bytes