Re: [PATCH 9/9] Create: set array status to frozen until monitoring starts
From: Martin Wilck <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-08 07:31:22
On 08/08/2013 02:44 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013 23:38:03 +0200 mwilck@arcor.de wrote:quoted
When we create an array while mdmon is working on an event (e.g. disk failure), the meta data on disk may not be up-to-date. Patch "DDF: ddf_open_new: check device status for new subarray" added some checks for in the monitor for that situation - in particular, to handle a freshly created array with faulty disks. The remaining problem is that the kernel may start syncing the disks before this situation is detected. This patch delays recovery until mdmon finished checking. tests/10ddf-fail-create-race should succeed reliably with this patch and "DDF: ddf_open_new: check device status for new subarray". Without, it will fail sporadically. Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <redacted> --- Create.c | 8 ++++++++ managemon.c | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)diff --git a/Create.c b/Create.c index ac22f77..f9b7db2 100644 --- a/Create.c +++ b/Create.c@@ -993,6 +993,14 @@ int Create(struct supertype *st, char *mddev, need_mdmon = 0; break; default: + /* + * The meta data we saw on disk may not be + * up-to-date. The monitor will check and + * possibly fail. Avoid a resync happening + * in the kernel before that. + */ + sysfs_set_str(&info, NULL, "sync_action", + "frozen"); err = sysfs_set_str(&info, NULL, "array_state", "readonly"); break;diff --git a/managemon.c b/managemon.c index f40bbdb..5bc54da 100644 --- a/managemon.c +++ b/managemon.c@@ -744,6 +744,12 @@ static void manage_new(struct mdstat_ent *mdstat, new->container = NULL; free_aa(new); } else { + /* + * Create() set this to frozen. + * This relies on the kernel clear FROZEN status + * if an invalid value is written to sync_action. + */ + sysfs_set_str(&new->info, NULL, "sync_action", ""); replace_array(container, victim, new); if (failed) { new->check_degraded = 1;I don't think that this patch should be necessary. If you find it makes a difference, then I'm missing something. Recovery never starts while the array is readonly - the kernel doesn't allow it. So mdmon should be in complete control as it is the only one that is allowed to change the array from readonly. Whether it quite does the right thing in this case I can't promise, but it should be able to do the right thing without any extra help from mdadm.
I had a look at the dmesg output and it appeared to me that the kernel started resync on the new array before it noticed that one of the disks were faulty. But I may have been mistaken. Unfortunately I didn't keep those logs. For now I am fine with what you are saying - you know the ways of the kernel MD driver way better then me.
And writing an empty string to 'sync_action' will not do anything useful. You probably mean to write "idle".
Hmm...
4223 static ssize_t
4224 action_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *page, size_t len)
4225 {
...
4229 if (cmd_match(page, "frozen"))
4230 set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery);
4231 else
4232 clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery);
To me this looks as if FROZEN was cleared whenever anything else but
"frozen" was written. What am I missing here? I actually meant to do
exactly that because I didn't want to loose the previous status. But as
I said, I am not familiar enough with the kernel md code to understand
exactly what happens.
I've applied and push out the previous patches but not this one.
Thanks. Martin -- Dr. Martin Wilck PRIMERGY System Software Engineer x86 Server Engineering FUJITSU Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1 33106 Paderborn, Germany Phone: ++49 5251 525 2796 Fax: ++49 5251 525 2820 Email: martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com Internet: http://ts.fujitsu.com Company Details: http://ts.fujitsu.com/imprint