Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 4 authors, 2013-08-08

Re: [PATCH 9/9] Create: set array status to frozen until monitoring starts

From: Martin Wilck <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-08 07:31:22

On 08/08/2013 02:44 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
On Tue,  6 Aug 2013 23:38:03 +0200 mwilck@arcor.de wrote:
quoted
When we create an array while mdmon is working on an event
(e.g. disk failure), the meta data on disk may not be up-to-date.

Patch "DDF: ddf_open_new: check device status for new subarray"
added some checks for in the monitor for that situation - in particular,
to handle a freshly created array with faulty disks. The remaining
problem is that the kernel may start syncing the disks before this
situation is detected. This patch delays recovery until mdmon finished
checking.

tests/10ddf-fail-create-race should succeed reliably with this patch
and "DDF: ddf_open_new: check device status for new subarray". Without,
it will fail sporadically.

Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <redacted>
---
 Create.c    |    8 ++++++++
 managemon.c |    6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Create.c b/Create.c
index ac22f77..f9b7db2 100644
--- a/Create.c
+++ b/Create.c
@@ -993,6 +993,14 @@ int Create(struct supertype *st, char *mddev,
 				need_mdmon = 0;
 				break;
 			default:
+				/*
+				 * The meta data we saw on disk may not be
+				 * up-to-date. The monitor will check and
+				 * possibly fail. Avoid a resync happening
+				 * in the kernel before that.
+				 */
+				sysfs_set_str(&info, NULL, "sync_action",
+					      "frozen");
 				err = sysfs_set_str(&info, NULL, "array_state",
 						    "readonly");
 				break;
diff --git a/managemon.c b/managemon.c
index f40bbdb..5bc54da 100644
--- a/managemon.c
+++ b/managemon.c
@@ -744,6 +744,12 @@ static void manage_new(struct mdstat_ent *mdstat,
 		new->container = NULL;
 		free_aa(new);
 	} else {
+		/*
+		 * Create() set this to frozen.
+		 * This relies on the kernel clear FROZEN status
+		 * if an invalid value is written to sync_action.
+		 */
+		sysfs_set_str(&new->info, NULL, "sync_action", "");
 		replace_array(container, victim, new);
 		if (failed) {
 			new->check_degraded = 1;

I don't think that this patch should be necessary.
If you find it makes a difference, then I'm missing something.

Recovery never starts while the array is readonly - the kernel doesn't allow
it.
So mdmon should be in complete control as it is the only one that is allowed
to change the array from readonly.

Whether it quite does the right thing in this case I can't promise, but it
should be able to do the right thing without any extra help from mdadm.
I had a look at the dmesg output and it appeared to me that the kernel
started resync on the new array before it noticed that one of the disks
were faulty. But I may have been mistaken. Unfortunately I didn't keep
those logs. For now I am fine with what you are saying - you know the
ways of the kernel MD driver way better then me.
And writing an empty string to 'sync_action' will not do anything useful.
You probably mean to write "idle".
Hmm...

4223 static ssize_t
4224 action_store(struct mddev *mddev, const char *page, size_t len)
4225 {
...
4229     if (cmd_match(page, "frozen"))
4230         set_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery);
4231     else
4232         clear_bit(MD_RECOVERY_FROZEN, &mddev->recovery);

To me this looks as if FROZEN was cleared whenever anything else but
"frozen" was written. What am I missing here? I actually meant to do
exactly that because I didn't want to loose the previous status. But as
I said, I am not familiar enough with the kernel md code to understand
exactly what happens.
I've applied and push out the previous patches but not this one.
Thanks.
Martin



-- 
Dr. Martin Wilck
PRIMERGY System Software Engineer
x86 Server Engineering

FUJITSU
Fujitsu Technology Solutions GmbH
Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1
33106 Paderborn, Germany
Phone:			++49 5251 525 2796
Fax:			++49 5251 525 2820
Email:			martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com
Internet:		http://ts.fujitsu.com
Company Details:	http://ts.fujitsu.com/imprint
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help