Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 8 authors, 2013-07-09

Re: question about the best suited RAID level/layout

From: Stan Hoeppner <hidden>
Date: 2013-07-09 15:50:04

On 7/7/2013 12:26 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 11:45 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
quoted
Maybe an example will help.  Is a 12 drive array faster than a 10 drive
array?  Yes, of course.  If your chassis holds 12 drives and you assign
two as spares, then you have 10 drives in your array.  That's 20%
slower.  If you keep spares on a shelf and hot swap them in after
failure, you can have all 12 drives in your array and not lose that 20%
performance.
Ah... okay I see what you were talking about ... sure... 
but it's not
the hot swap that will (directly) degrade performance...  
You seem to be having significant trouble parsing/digesting the
information given to you.  I didn't state, nor suggest, nor imply that
hot swap degrades performance.  Not sure how you ended up with this
idea.  I'll chalk it up to lack of knowledge/experience.
ist because you
don't use all your slots and thereby not getting out the maxmimum
performance gain possible due to the striping...
Yes.  I stated this twice now.  Glad you finally got it. ;)
quoted
Well of course.  By designing your storage with dissimilar drives to
avoid a rare, show stopping, firmware bug that may or may not be present
in a specific drive model, you're simultaneously exposing yourself to
other issues because the firmware doesn't match.  Performance will be
suboptimal as your drives will have difference response times.
Sure, but as said performance isn't the main goal...
It would benefit you greatly if you'd stop rebutting the information
presented to you, digest the information, commit it to memory, and use
it or not, now or in the future.  I am not a salesman trying to convince
you to use one method or another.  I am a teacher presenting you with
both pros and cons of multiple configuration options.  There is no need
for argument or rebuttal here.
quoted
Additionally, timeout and error handling will likely be different,
causing the same.  Interpreting S.M.A.R.T. data will be difficult
because each of the drives will report various metrics differently, etc,
etc.  So instead of only being required to become intimately familiar
with one drive model, you must do so for 4 or 5 drive models.
Sure..
You're discounting expert insight out of hand because it doesn't agree
with your predisposition, and you are being adversarial with those
presenting conflicting information.  You're acting a bit like the
immature Kim Jong-un, but you are presumably unable to have those who
disagree with you executed or imprisoned.  Thankfully.

-- 
Stan
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help